Home

ACRL

Recent Posts

Recent Comments:

  • Maura Smale: Thanks Anne! Your syllabus and class schedule was so helpful to me, thanks for posting it online.
  • Anne Pemberton: Glad you are teaching a course! If we (at UNCW) can help you at all let us know. We began offering...
  • Maura Smale: Thanks Sarah! We had a great discussion in class today, it’s a good group. And Stephen, thanks for...
  • lynne craddock: Congratulations Maureen! As a Librarian Tall Texan, I had the honor and pleasure of being one of your...
  • Stephen Francoeur: Wow, I wish I’d taken a look at some of those syllabi before I’d started teaching my...

  • Recent Trackback

  • Staying the Course: has been and continues to be lots of debate over whether credit-bearing courses are the best way...

Recommended Posts



Site search

Have a story idea?

Pages

Categories

Archive

Authors

Blogroll

Manage

Login

Web Feeds

Entries RSS

Comments RSS

Advertising to the Rescue!

The New York Times (in its Media & Advertising section, mind, not its Science section) reports that Reed Elsevier has come up with a way to provide free medical information to those poor oncologists who can’t afford multiple subscriptions and aren’t connected to a research institution with a library. They can sign up for a new service that will be funded by advertising! Voila – access. And lots of new advertising revenue for Reed Elsevier, since the market for advertising in journals with small subscription bases has dried up because nobody can afford their journals.

Monique Fayad, an Elsevier senior vice president, said the total online advertising market was growing “in double digits” and added, “We expect it will be a $1 billion opportunity within the next two years.”

So, let me get this straight: Having big pharma fund access is okay, but public funding is not because it might corrupt the peer review process. Huh?

Write a comment