Home

ACRL

Recent Posts

Recent Comments:

  • Marc: I really enjoyed this post! Like Sarah said, working as an academic librarian is a juggling act. One thing that...
  • Mark K.: Yes…Sharing the credit is an inherently good-person and truthful thing to do. It’s also...
  • CharS: “It’s much more challenging to start researching from scratch…” But that’s what...
  • Barbara Fister: I like the people I work with, I have plenty of variety in my work, and if I make a mistake, nobody...
  • Barbara Fister: I agree – plus it’s more fun. Another issue is that we can’t just settle for...

  • Recent Trackback

Recommended Posts



Site search

Have a story idea?

Pages

Categories

Archive

Authors

Blogroll

Manage

Login

Web Feeds

Entries RSS

Comments RSS

Advertising to the Rescue!

The New York Times (in its Media & Advertising section, mind, not its Science section) reports that Reed Elsevier has come up with a way to provide free medical information to those poor oncologists who can’t afford multiple subscriptions and aren’t connected to a research institution with a library. They can sign up for a new service that will be funded by advertising! Voila – access. And lots of new advertising revenue for Reed Elsevier, since the market for advertising in journals with small subscription bases has dried up because nobody can afford their journals.

Monique Fayad, an Elsevier senior vice president, said the total online advertising market was growing “in double digits” and added, “We expect it will be a $1 billion opportunity within the next two years.”

So, let me get this straight: Having big pharma fund access is okay, but public funding is not because it might corrupt the peer review process. Huh?

Write a comment