Home

ACRL

Recent Posts

Recent Comments:

  • Erin: Thank for the blog post shout out :) Great tips here – I agree, particularly about attending social...
  • John: We did successfully get a Twitter feed to display during the Libraries Open House at Penn State. A great way to...
  • Julie K: You could even do a VERY low budget version of this by creating jpgs from power point slides (or other...
  • GavinB: You may want to consider placing the display somewhere other than the entrance. An entrance is a space which...
  • stevenb: For a smaller library facility, I wouldn’t necessary advise going with a wall mounted display monitor....

  • Recent Trackback

Recommended Posts



Site search

Have a story idea?

Pages

Categories

Archive

Authors

Blogroll

Manage

Login

Web Feeds

Entries RSS

Comments RSS

Reading in the Vulgate

Julie Elliott has an interesting article in the most recent issue of RUSQ on academic libraries and reading promotion. (Yes, I’m quoted in it, but don’t let that put you off.)

Indulging in a fondness for books has become a contested territory. People think of books as our “brand” even though libraries offer much more. If we reinforce that outdated view of libraries by celebrating books, are we selling our libraries short – or are we honoring something people actually love about libraries? The Librarian in Black is irritated that public libraries have summer reading clubs; it suggests that reading is better than other activities and that people who don’t read aren’t welcome at the library. But is being irritated by popular forms of reading another kind of elitism?

Beyond the “we’re more than just books” argument is the fact that academic forms of reading differ from popular literacy practices. Oprah’s endorsement of reading as something that will expand your horizons draws on personal identification with characters and situations rather than the analytical, critical approach taught in college. Public libraries have long honored diverse reading tastes, but academic libraries are likely to be accused of wasting money if they purchase genre fiction or popular history (even if it’s of high quality). Academic libraries that try to satisfy students’ interest in reading outside the syllabus risk being tarred with the scarlet letter “O,” encouraging reading for pleasure at the expense of reading seriously.

Common reading programs
on college campuses are growing in popularity. They give first year students an opportunity to to talk about something they have in common that has academic credentials. But they are modeled on community reading programs (started with Seattle Reads) and so are smack dab in the middle of that contest over how we should read.

Academic libraries may be the perfect place to explore those contested notions of reading. Maybe we can help our students take pleasure in the reading they do for courses – and take their pleasure reading seriously.

Comments

Comment from Alice
Time: May 21, 2007, 1:04 pm

We all have problem getting students into reading. My students have trouble even with the computer catalog. I work with smaller children not college age and they think they know it all about the computer. But the best way my students get interest in a book is by other children talking bout it and teachers encourgaing them to read a title or find other by that author or subject. This also get them to look books up on the computers. They even check out ebooks.

Pingback from Why Do Students Read?
Time: May 31, 2007, 10:02 pm

[...] Barbara’s post about promoting reading for pleasure reminded me of something Twyla Tharp wrote in her book The Creative Habit: I read for a lot of reasons, pleasure being the least of them. [...]

Write a comment