Home

ACRL

Recent Posts

Recent Comments:

  • Erin: Thank for the blog post shout out :) Great tips here – I agree, particularly about attending social...
  • John: We did successfully get a Twitter feed to display during the Libraries Open House at Penn State. A great way to...
  • Julie K: You could even do a VERY low budget version of this by creating jpgs from power point slides (or other...
  • GavinB: You may want to consider placing the display somewhere other than the entrance. An entrance is a space which...
  • stevenb: For a smaller library facility, I wouldn’t necessary advise going with a wall mounted display monitor....

  • Recent Trackback

Recommended Posts



Site search

Have a story idea?

Pages

Categories

Archive

Authors

Blogroll

Manage

Login

Web Feeds

Entries RSS

Comments RSS

Censorship at the Department of Education?

For the past few years, many ACRL members have been concerned about changes to the research arm of the U.S. Department of Education and with the direction of federally-supported programs like the National Library of Education and ERIC. For those who have not followed these issues, let me recommend the EBSS ERIC News site and a brief story that appeared in Education Week (”Basement No Bargain for Agency Library,” January 29, 2003).

The March issue of Educational Researcher carries a disturbing essay by Alan H. Schoenfeld (UC-Berkeley) on the possibility that the Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences may have been involved in an attempt to squelch the publication of essays critical of one its recent innovations, the What Works Clearinghouse.

From the abstract:

“An early version of this article . . . was written for the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). The Institute of Education Sciences (IES), which funds WWC, instructed WWC not to publish it. An expanded version, written at WWC’s invitation for a special issue of an independent electronic journal and a book to be published by WWC, argued that methodological problems rendered some WWC mathematics reports potentially misleading and/or uninterpretable. IES instructed WWC staff not to publish their chapters – thus canceling the publication of the special issue and the book. Those actions, chronicled here, raise important questions concerning the role of federal agencies and their contracting organizations in suppressing scientific research that casts doubt on current or intended federal policy.”

Talk about an “open access” problem!

For those following the direct link above, please note that there are additional materials (including a response from WWC staff) available from the home page for the March 2006 issue.

Write a comment